[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?


Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

Well, assuming .changes is not snake-oil, then why should in-deb sigs be
called snake-oil?  After all, according to you they essentially do the same

Not exactly. .changes files say that the archive should be changed. If the archive were to accept any signed .deb just because a developer signed it, that would be bad(tm).


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: