Re: Secret changes for binNMUs
Andreas Barth <email@example.com> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow (firstname.lastname@example.org) [051123 15:51]:
>> - binNMU version scheme changed
>> The developer reference _still_ states binNMU should be versioned as
>> 1.2-3.0.1. The DAK will no longer accept this.
> I am sorry that the developers reference is a bit lagging currently. Do
> you have some new wording available, or do you want till I find time to
> fix it myself?
I can give it a shot and send you a draft for it.
>From a technical point I'm unsure how the following version will
(sbuild) and should (dak) be handled:
old version binNMU version?
I bet the later will confuse wanna-build, sbuild and the dak and just
require a new maintainer upload or source NMU instead. But is the
former one correct?