Re: Secret changes for binNMUs

[Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>]

Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> writes:

> * Goswin von Brederlow (brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) [051123 15:51]:
>> - binNMU version scheme changed
>> 
>>   The developer reference _still_ states binNMU should be versioned as
>>   1.2-3.0.1. The DAK will no longer accept this.
>
> I am sorry that the developers reference is a bit lagging currently. Do
> you have some new wording available, or do you want till I find time to
> fix it myself?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
> -- 
>   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

I can give it a shot and send you a draft for it.

>From a technical point I'm unsure how the following version will
(sbuild) and should (dak) be handled:

old version         binNMU version?
1.2                 1.2-0+b1
1.2-3.0.1           1.2-3.0.1+b1

I bet the later will confuse wanna-build, sbuild and the dak and just
require a new maintainer upload or source NMU instead. But is the
former one correct?

MfG
        Goswin