also sprach Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org> [2005.11.22.1650 +0100]: > As I'm responsible for most of dpkg-sig's code (and planned to do > some more work in the next two months) I'd like to know if anyone > cares about using these binary signatures or if I can invest my > time into something that's a bit more satisfying (== non-Debian > stuff). As the ftp-masters and the dpkg maintainers seem to have > no interest in the whole thing, I'm beginning to doubt that it's > sensible to work on dpkg-sig. I fully support dpkg-sig and do not appreciate having to hear that a decision was made without the giving the collective of developers a chance to voice their opinions before. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "man soll nicht in kirchen gehn, wenn man reine luft atmen will." - friedrich nietzsche
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)