Re: State of gcc 2.95 use in Debian unstable
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Malloc debugging, #285685 suggests it is broken for > 300 days now,
> > either update or remove:
> > Steve M. Robbins <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > ccmalloc Build-Depends: g++-2.95 [alpha arm i386 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc]
> It's not broken. That bug is there to remind me to improve the package dependencies.
> Ccmalloc isn't dependent on GCC 2.95 per se. It's just that we build
> a stub for each supported version of g++. So if 2.95 goes away, I'll
> just remove that build-dep. No problem.
Ok, I'll record it as "Build-Deps on g++-2.95 only to support gcc-2.95".