Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: is the Debian mail server healthy?
- From: Nathanael Nerode <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 13:58:40 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] email@example.com>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <E1EW9rQ-0005Cd-Dt@scyw00225.scy001.de> <28E061CC-26F8-4101-A177-36EF80968B70@fnord.no> <E1EWIub-0003Kx-M1@scyw00225.scy001.de>
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:34:49 +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>On Oct 30, 2005, at 10:52, Marc Haber wrote:
>>> I can confirm that master sits on some messages for days, such as this
>>> one, for example:
>>> |Received: from master.debian.org ([126.96.36.199])
>>> | by torres.zugschlus.de with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
>>> | id 1EVmC6-0000lm-8a
>>> | for email@example.com; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:36:07 +0200
>>> |Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1
>>> | id 1EUOw2-0003y4-00; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:33:50 -0500
>>> So, there might be a problem, because these things happen quite
>>> regularly in the last few weeks.
>>That does not mean that master has not tried to deliver it to you
>>during these days.
> If it didn't try, it's broken. torres was available all the time and
> was actually receiving mail.
On a related note, the list archives are not working right. Steve
Langasek's latest message to debian-devel-announce hasn't shown up
in the archives at all. 'serious' bug filed against listarchives, but maybe
someone reading this will know a faster way to check this out.