Re: Transition time: KDE, JACK, arts, sablotron, unixodbc, net-snmp, php, ...
Scripsit Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
> Scripsit Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
>> This is a reasonable concern, but the standing policy is that if a package
>> is RC-buggy, it's a candidate for removal from testing at any time.
> The fact that "it is a candidate for removal" is a completely
> different state from "it _has_ been removed". I don't see how you can
> suppose that the difference is not important for maintainers.
Calm down, Henning ... view this as an opportunity to contribute
rather than a reason to complain.
So, would anybody object if I set up a cronjob that emails the PTS
whenever a (source) package propagates to, or is removed from, testing?
--
Henning Makholm "I always thought being *real* sad
would be *cooler* than acting *fake*
sad, but it's not. It's not cool at *all*."
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Transition time: KDE, JACK, arts, sablotron, unixodbc, net-snmp, php, ...
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: Transition time: KDE, JACK, arts, sablotron, unixodbc, net-snmp, php, ...
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- References:
- Re: Transition time: KDE, JACK, arts, sablotron, unixodbc, net-snmp, php, ...
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Re: Transition time: KDE, JACK, arts, sablotron, unixodbc, net-snmp, php, ...
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Transition time: KDE, JACK, arts, sablotron, unixodbc, net-snmp, php, ...
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Prev by Date:
Re: Best practices on system users and groups
- Next by Date:
Re: postinst scripts failing because a new conffile wasn't accepted: Is it a bug?
- Previous by thread:
Re: Transition time: KDE, JACK, arts, sablotron, unixodbc, net-snmp, php, ...
- Next by thread:
Re: Transition time: KDE, JACK, arts, sablotron, unixodbc, net-snmp, php, ...
- Index(es):