[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits from the release team: the plans for etch



This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> 
> > * Thomas Bushnell BSG (tb@becket.net) wrote:
> >> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> >> 
> >> > Leaving around unused accounts is plainly wrong too, and also a
> >> > potential security risk.  
> >> 
> >> Can you outline the risk please?
> >
> > Sure.  Locking accounts isn't necessairly perfect.  
> 
> What is an account in the password file?  It's nothing more than the
> ability to log in under a given UID.  How is a starred password
> anything other than perfect locking of the account?

Many authentiaction systems do not use pam or shadow authentication.
That's the point of the counter argument.  I remember setting up ssh
authorized keys for uucp, and that is a locked account (of course the
command set and the host range was limited, but you see the point).
-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.                                            Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :                                        sgran@debian.org |
|  `. `'                        Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-                                     http://www.debian.org |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: