confused MTA - body != headers
It looks like some mail program can't cope with the fact I put lines
in my message body prefixed with "To:" and "CC:". Oh well.
The full message is at <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/315059>.
Looks like a Fidonet Gateway - Amazing that Fidonet is still around.
--- Begin Message ---
Topics:
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Mail failure - malformed recipient address
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
debian-devel@p9.dpk.berlin.fido.de
Unrouteable address
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <bam@debian.org>
Received: from ftn by marathon-new.karcher.local with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ETcoa-00032V-E1
for debian-devel@p9.dpk.berlin.fido.de; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:10:57 +0200
Received: by p9.dpk.berlin.fido (FIDOGATE 4.4.10)
id AA10674; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:02:19 +0200
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:29:36 +0200
From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Subject: Drop KRB4 support from HEIMDAL
Message-ID: <[🔎] sa48xwldtb3.fsf@snoopy.microcomaustralia.com.au>
To: debian-devel@p9.dpk.berlin.fido.de, bug#315059 and submitter (Michael Karcher)
Cc: krb4 maintainer and openafs maintainers
Organization: Point 9 - DOS Pudels Kern
Lines: 27
X-Gateway: FIDO p9.dpk.berlin.fido.de [FIDOGATE 4.4.10], RFC1036/822 WAD.in-berlin.de [FIDOGATE 4.4.4]
X-FTN-From: Brian May @ 242:7000/2.0
X-FTN-To: Michael Karcher @ 242:7000/710.9
X-FTN-Tearline: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
X-FTN-Via: FIDOGATE/rfc2ftn 242:7000/2.0, Sun Oct 23 2005 at 02:00:19 CEST
X-FTN-Via: FIDOGATE/ftntoss 242:7000/2.0, Sun Oct 23 2005 at 02:05:00 CEST
X-FTN-Via: 242:7000/704@fidode @20051022.020306 FastEcho 1.46.1 2212
X-FTN-Via: 242:7000/710@fido.de @20051023.085328 FastEcho 1.46.1 1078
X-FTN-Via: FIDOGATE/ftntoss 242:7000/710.9, Sun Oct 23 2005 at 12:02:13 CEST
X-FTN-Domain: Z242@FidoDE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello,
There have been increasing calls for me to drop krb4 support in
Heimdal (first in bug #315059 and now by upstream in bug #334632 - it
would also solve #236851). It would also eliminate confusion such as
in bug #330151 (not a bug).
Would this effect anybody? Would this break anything?
I noted when I was experimenting with openafs last I couldn't get it
to work without krb4 support in Heimdal KDC, but admit I may have been
doing something wrong.
krb4 is generally considered obsolete and insecure - I think the only
reason it was requested was because of AFS requirements - does that
reason still apply?
Thanks.
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
A message that you sent contained one or more recipient addresses that were
incorrectly constructed:
bug#315059 and submitter (Michael Karcher): missing or malformed local part (expected word or "<")
krb4 maintainer and openafs maintainers: missing or malformed local part (expected word or "<")
These addresses have been ignored. The other addresses in the message were
syntactically valid and have been passed on for an attempt at delivery.
------ This is a copy of your message, including all the headers. ------
Received: by p9.dpk.berlin.fido (FIDOGATE 4.4.10)
id AA10674; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:02:19 +0200
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:29:36 +0200
From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Subject: Drop KRB4 support from HEIMDAL
Message-ID: <[🔎] sa48xwldtb3.fsf@snoopy.microcomaustralia.com.au>
To: debian-devel, bug#315059 and submitter (Michael Karcher)
To: debian-devel@p9.dpk.berlin.fido.de, bug#315059 and submitter (Michael Karcher)
Cc: krb4 maintainer and openafs maintainers
Organization: Point 9 - DOS Pudels Kern
Lines: 27
X-Gateway: FIDO p9.dpk.berlin.fido.de [FIDOGATE 4.4.10], RFC1036/822 WAD.in-berlin.de [FIDOGATE 4.4.4]
X-FTN-From: Brian May @ 242:7000/2.0
X-FTN-To: Michael Karcher @ 242:7000/710.9
X-FTN-Tearline: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
X-FTN-Via: FIDOGATE/rfc2ftn 242:7000/2.0, Sun Oct 23 2005 at 02:00:19 CEST
X-FTN-Via: FIDOGATE/ftntoss 242:7000/2.0, Sun Oct 23 2005 at 02:05:00 CEST
X-FTN-Via: 242:7000/704@fidode @20051022.020306 FastEcho 1.46.1 2212
X-FTN-Via: 242:7000/710@fido.de @20051023.085328 FastEcho 1.46.1 1078
X-FTN-Via: FIDOGATE/ftntoss 242:7000/710.9, Sun Oct 23 2005 at 12:02:13 CEST
X-FTN-Domain: Z242@FidoDE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello,
There have been increasing calls for me to drop krb4 support in
Heimdal (first in bug #315059 and now by upstream in bug #334632 - it
would also solve #236851). It would also eliminate confusion such as
in bug #330151 (not a bug).
Would this effect anybody? Would this break anything?
I noted when I was experimenting with openafs last I couldn't get it
to work without krb4 support in Heimdal KDC, but admit I may have been
doing something wrong.
krb4 is generally considered obsolete and insecure - I think the only
reason it was requested was because of AFS requirements - does that
reason still apply?
Thanks.
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--- End Message ---
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Reply to: