On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 03:32:57PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > On Saturday 22 October 2005 12:08, Rudolf Weeber wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Rudolf Weeber <firstname.lastname@example.org> > > > > * Package name : dspam > > Version : x.y.z > > Upstream Author : Deep Logic Inc. > > * URL : www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam > > * License : gpl > > Description : Highly accurate and fast statistical spam filter > > Rather than filing the 200th ITP for dspam please consider joining > email@example.com or the #debian-dspam channel > on irc.freenode.net. There is a lot of movement going on currently. > And you are surely welcome there. :) > > Kind regards > Christoph Hi, would it be worthwhile to compare a new ITP with the currently pending ITP's to see if this is a duplicate and if so, tell the originator that s/he is attempting to ITP a package that someone else is already intending to ITP. Cheers, Kev ps. it seems an ITP sometimes has the 'default' info, (ie. x.y.z). Is this not checked and then have the originator's email rejected or have an email note that this should be resent with fields corrected. -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! `$' $' $ $ _ ,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b ,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$ $$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $ `$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $ `Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
Description: Digital signature