Re: Effort to change IETF's copying conditions for RFCs
* Simon Josefsson:
>> I think you might get broader support in the vendor community if you
>> make the license for modified copying non-copyleft.
>
> Yes, that is the intention. Requiring a copyleft license is likely to
> meet with disapproval from too many people, for various reasons.
But isn't the "this notice [...] preserved" part problematic?
| The Contributor grants third parties the right to copy and distribute
| the Contribution, with or without modification, in any medium,
| without royalty, provided that the copyright notice and this notice
| are preserved, and that any claims of being the authorative RFC are
| removed.
Reply to: