Re: curl status update
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:03:26PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <email@example.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
> > > > libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
> > > > depend on libcurl3 (with openssl) or libcurl3-gnutls respectively.
> > > Why is openssl the default?
> > > I think everybody agrees that in the long period everybody will want to
> > > use gnutls, which is supposed to have the same features but does not
> > > have licensing issues.
> > GnuTLS, OTOH, is licensed under the GPL (as opposed to the LGPL)
> Are you sure? http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/ says the core library
> is LGPL. Maybe just the tools are GPL?
Oh? I thought it was. Sorry; I'll check my facts next time.
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond