Re: Would a "still depends on libkpathsea3" bug be RC? (was: How to prevent a library transition)
* Frank Küster (email@example.com) [050929 10:07]:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> If my second interpretation is right, we depend on maintainers' action
> >> for that. In order to make all dependencies on the old version
> >> disappear, would a "still depends on libkpathsea3" bug be RC?
> > Yes, fixable with a quick-and-dirty NMU that only does a rebuild against the
> > new one...
> That was what I was thinking about; but the question is whether the
> release team would actually support such a severity; I don't want to
> support libkpathsea3 for a long time (although AFAICT it didn't change
> at all during the lifetime of teTeX-2.0.2).
It has been practice for quite some time to bump up "depends on
$package" to RC-grade once removal of $package is very near.