On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:11:05PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh said > >From memory, lyx is a major mess that FTBFS with gcc4 in very horripilant > ways, uses yada, and is otherwise NMU-unfriendly IMHO. But it has been some > time since I tried to build it. > > It is also outdated (1.3.6 is available upstream since July, 16th). Maybe > the new upstream version has better code and will compile cleanly with gcc > 4. 1.3.6 compiles cleanly with gcc 4.0, yes (aside from #328684). > IMHO lyx really needs new extra blood maintaining it, and maybe even to be > repackaged from scratch. Sorry, I do not have enough time to tack such a > major cleanup in such a complex application right now, or I'd be offering > myself (I like lyx a lot and use it for my texts as much as I can). Sorry about the delay, but it has been repackaged from scratch to use debhelper (though debian/rules is still kinda gross, patches welcome). -rob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature