[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: jack still broken



On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:14:47AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> This has been going on for three months.

> > Why has it taken three months for the reverse dependencies to be rebuilt?
> > That shouldn't really be acceptable, whether or not there's some reason for
> > (effective) conflicts between different versions of the lib.

> AFAICT there weren't bugs filed against those packages telling them to
> be rebuilt, because the libjack people believe their libraries don't
> conflict.

Then the "libjack people" need to be cluebatted, whoever they are; conflicts
aren't the only reason why bugs should be filed.

Anyway, bugs #317196, 317208, 321222, and presumably various others were
filed by *someone*...

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: