Re: architecture-specific release criteria - requalification needed
"Ingo Juergensmann" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The proposal make some very exact guidelines like the 98% rule whereas
> it is very unprecise in other regards. I find this quite irrating and
> thus asking for clarification.
Actually, the 98% rule is not in the proposal. It was given as a
possible rule of thumb when you asked for more concrete guidelines.
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *