Re: g77 -> gfortran transition and AMD64 g77 bugs
Kevin B. McCarty writes:
> Gfortran claims not to be completely ready for use as a g77 replacement
> yet (and someone who has attempted to compile Cernlib with it reports a
> large number of problems yet). But eventually that day will come... we
> should have some transition plan in mind by then.
upstream does explicitely ask distributors to package g77 in addition
to gfortran. etch will ship with a g77, based on g77-3.4.
> In addition, (speaking as Cernlib Debian maintainer) I have a specific
> question about g77 in Debian. There are two g77 bugs that can cause
> significant problems in mixed FORTRAN/C applications on AMD64 machines:
> Could someone tell me whether it is likely that both will eventually be
> fixed in the g77-3.4 available in Debian? If so, in what timeframe?
> The latter is fixed upstream, but the former is apparently unfixed. It
> can apparently be worked around with the -fno-f2c flag. But this (from
> the first half of my email) will be incompatible with any current
> FORTRAN libraries in Debian.
bugs fixed upstream will be fixed in Debian with next sync from the
CVS branch, likely to happen, when the current gcc-3.4 packages enter
testing. Other bugs are likely to remain unfixed.
Given the differences in g77 and gfortran, you may want to propose a
policy for Debian packages, how to build the packages.