Fredderic writes: > But at the end of the day, a very basic runlevel 1, a fairly complete > runlevel 5, and a means to easily configure the runlevels without losing > any (a problem with some of the older runlevel editors I've used), > especially losing information about what priority the service is supposed > to be started/stopped at, is essential, I think. If you've had any such problems with sysvconfig please file bug reports. -- John Hasler