[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Reviving the Debian FAQ

Kamaraju Kusumanchi <kk288@cornell.edu> writes:
> The document does not endorse using unstable. It clearly encourages to 
> use stable. But if one wants to choose between unstable and testing then 
> it says to go with unstable.

It's fine to give reasons why unstable might be preferable given such a
choice (though your general tone seems somewhat unfairly biased against
testing -- you make it sound scarier that it really is).  But the sentence
"Testing is intended for Debian developers. If you are not a Debian
developer, then install unstable as opposed to testing" is nonsensical;
just get rid of it.

97% of everything is grunge

Reply to: