[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: wnpp situation

Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> writes:

> tb@becket.net wrote:
>>There is no good reason to close old RFPs unless the upstream source
>>has diseappeared.
> The spectacular amount of clutter they provide -- rendering the wnpp bug list 
> unreadable unless you ignore them all -- combined with their total 
> uselessness?  Seems like a pair of good reasons to me.
> Count me in favor of deleting RFPs more than a year and a half old.

I have no problem with deleting RFPs because you know they don't make
sense any more.

But mere time isn't necessarily a good test here, the way it is for
the other wnpp transitions.  

However, it's not something I feel particularly strongly about.

Reply to: