On Sep 12, Richard Atterer <richard@2005.atterer.net> wrote: > > I do not believe that it's worth the effort, there are no really good > > reasons to use OpenSSL in the long time. > > Development effort should be focused on fixing any eventual gnutls bugs > > (either in the library itself or in the libcurl glue). > Well, how much is "in the long run"? It could be years. Furthermore, One year at most, considering that so far I have not seen reports of major problems with libcurl+libgnutls. > OpenSSL is simply much more popular, plus it will stay the "primary" SSL So what? > implementation for curl upstream for the foreseeable future. Again, who cares? If Debian will use gnutls by default it will get more than enough testing. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature