Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?
- To: email@example.com
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:21:23 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4324ADE3.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <20050825151602.GJ2339@khazad-dum.debian.net>
- References: <20050824145040.GA6034@xpeerience.u-strasbg.fr> <email@example.com> <20050824154404.GB20087@opium.palfrader.org> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20050824164317.GB23866@seanius.net> <email@example.com> <20050825151602.GJ2339@khazad-dum.debian.net>
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> No. They are not even "supposed" to be scripts at all, it is pretty ok to
> use binary initscripts (but most people don't, and it really helps for stuff
> like that to be easy to debug, and binary is anything but).
Ummm, not it's not.
In particular, you'd be violating policy by....
1) Placing binaries in /etc, in violation of FHS 3.4.
2) Policy 9.3.x, which says they're scripts multiple times
3) I strongly suspect you'd be violating Policy 10.7.3 on the behavior
of configuration files.