Re: Spam on the BTS
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:47:21PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> spamscan is single-threaded, and the latency of DNSBL lookups is the
> main delay. We have less than 1 second to process each message on
> average. Any good recomendations for a perl inter-process
> communications library? Once it becomes multi-threaded CPU usage
> could become an issue, especially if we upgrade to spamassassin 3.
What's wrong with using native perl threads and mutexes ?
Francesco P. Lovergine