Re: Spam on the BTS
* Blars Blarson:
> Would it be acceptable to reject or drop more non-spam? (We could
> reject on CBL, getting rid of about half the spam and rejecting about
> one non-spam per day. CBL is easy to get off of.)
CBL has the advantage that you can make a local copy of the list
(which reduces name server load and avoids the name lookup latency),
but its license is somewhat non-free. Is this a problem for Debian?
What's causing most of the load right now? I think some of the effort
should probably concentrate on getting legitimate mail through faster.
Reply to: