[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Version tracking in the BTS

On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 23:42 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:

> I don't know if it's feasible, but my ideal vision for how the new
> version tracking would handle bugs in stable would be that if the
> version in stable is affected, the bug is left open if it's tagged
> sarge or if it's of RC severity; otherwise the bug is archived normally.
> I don't even see a reason to special-case "security", most such bugs are
> going to be of RC severity and the others can be tagged with the
> per-suite tag just as we've been doing.
This isn't great for the "maintainer view" of the bugs.  As maintainer,
I can't do anything about bugs in stable, so I don't want to see them on
the bug list.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: