On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 23:42 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I don't know if it's feasible, but my ideal vision for how the new > version tracking would handle bugs in stable would be that if the > version in stable is affected, the bug is left open if it's tagged > sarge or if it's of RC severity; otherwise the bug is archived normally. > I don't even see a reason to special-case "security", most such bugs are > going to be of RC severity and the others can be tagged with the > per-suite tag just as we've been doing. > This isn't great for the "maintainer view" of the bugs. As maintainer, I can't do anything about bugs in stable, so I don't want to see them on the bug list. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part