Re: Accepted fam 2.7.0-8 (source i386)
Russ Allbery <email@example.com> wrote:
>> For more information see:
> This reference doesn't help with the question of libraries that use
> C++ internally but don't expose a C++ interface.
You are absolutely right about that. However, like vorlon, I had
trouble remembering where the original discussion took place, so I
supplied this link instead.
If you inspect libfam.so.0.0.0 with readelf, you will see that it
technically does export some C++ symbols. However, since none of those
symbols are documented as part of the fam API, changes in those symbols
should be pretty harmless.