On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 08:07:42PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 07:47:17PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > The immediate suspect is binutils, particularily ld. It might be > > interesting to do test compiles with an older binutils version > > (2.15 vs. 2.16?) and see if the problem is reproducible. > The package in question was already build using binutils 2.16 > according to the buildd log. For each ever avalable version? Bastian -- Captain's Log, star date 21:34.5...
Description: Digital signature