[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?

On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 10:41 +0200, Marc Chantreux wrote:

> at least, i think zsh is better because it's almost 200k thinner:
> % ls -sh =zsh4 =bash
> 616K /bin/bash  456K /bin/zsh4

I acutally use ksh for all my shell scripts (bash hasn't quite made it
yet IMHO) and that beats both -
636K /bin/ksh

But for my uses I care little for the odd kilobyte saved in a program
thats being used in so many instances.

I also use php for a lot of scripting using the command line php

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: