Re: vancouver revisited
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:16:47AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 8/23/05, Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de> wrote:
> > In article <[🔎] dedhpf$vgs$1@sea.gmane.org> you wrote:
> > > The number of buildds required to keep up with the
> > > volume of uploaded packages must not be greater than two.
> > > There must be that many buildds, in addition there must also be a redundant
> > > buildd.
> >
> > This means 2 or 3?
>
> No, it says at most 2 buildds must be able to keep up by themselves.
> And that at least 1 extra buildd must be available.
No, it says exactly one extra.
I'd much rather have seen that point go, but that didn't happen.
--
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond
Reply to: