[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: vancouver revisited



On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:16:47AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 8/23/05, Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de> wrote:
> > In article <dedhpf$vgs$1@sea.gmane.org> you wrote:
> > > The number of buildds required to keep up with the
> > > volume of uploaded packages must not be greater than two.
> > > There must be that many buildds, in addition there must also be  a redundant
> > > buildd.
> > 
> > This means 2 or 3?
> 
> No, it says at most 2 buildds must be able to keep up by themselves.
> And that at least 1 extra buildd must be available.

No, it says exactly one extra.

I'd much rather have seen that point go, but that didn't happen.

-- 
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond



Reply to: