Re: vancouver revisited
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:16:47AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 8/23/05, Bernd Eckenfels <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > In article <[🔎] email@example.com> you wrote:
> > > The number of buildds required to keep up with the
> > > volume of uploaded packages must not be greater than two.
> > > There must be that many buildds, in addition there must also be a redundant
> > > buildd.
> > This means 2 or 3?
> No, it says at most 2 buildds must be able to keep up by themselves.
> And that at least 1 extra buildd must be available.
No, it says exactly one extra.
I'd much rather have seen that point go, but that didn't happen.
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond