[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: vancouver revisited

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:24:48PM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:

> > well, if the package is bogus from the language usage, than that's not
> > the porters problem (but how often did that hit exactly one arch?). If

> I have seen multiple examples of builds failing because the testsuite or
> a buildtime generated tool crashed on a specific arch due to bad coding
> practices.

That sounds like perfectly normal porting issues that ought to get fed
back to the maintainer as they would for any other arch.  Why on earth
would that be a problem?

"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Reply to: