Re: vancouver revisited
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:24:48PM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> > well, if the package is bogus from the language usage, than that's not
> > the porters problem (but how often did that hit exactly one arch?). If
> I have seen multiple examples of builds failing because the testsuite or
> a buildtime generated tool crashed on a specific arch due to bad coding
That sounds like perfectly normal porting issues that ought to get fed
back to the maintainer as they would for any other arch. Why on earth
would that be a problem?
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."