[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?

[Dustin Harriman]
> 1) Package descriptions should tend towards readers like grandma by
> default (ie. are as general as possible by default), and

What about the majority of packages in Debian?  You know, the ones your
hypothetical ancestor would never wish to install explicitly, under any
circumstances?  The ones whose purpose she will never understand or see
a need for on her system, even if you use very large type?

Whatever is wrong with the very simple concept of "if you don't
understand what this does, don't install it"?  There is no need for
dumbing down descriptions for things non-technical users aren't going
to be selecting anyway.  The set of packages whose descriptions your
geriatric relative needs to be able to understand is a very small
subset of Debian.  It would even be a very small subset of Ubuntu.

So I'd suggest concentrating on the 3% of packages non-technical users
might actually want to select manually, and making sure those have
legible and searchable descriptions.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: