[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ignoring upstream's version number?

On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 21:21 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> And how is this going to be fixed? The broken version
> number might be much higher than upstream's version
> number. AFAIK there is no way to turn it back, is it?

The maintainer could use an epoch to fix it. (It's like a 1: prefix.)

> 	2.5.130.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1
> 	2.5.13-0.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1

Is it really important to have the 0 split away? I think while dashes
are perfectly valid when there is a Debian revision they are not really
loved by the maintainers.

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern

Reply to: