Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > El dom, 31-07-2005 a las 19:13 +0200, Harald Dunkel escribió: > >>Hi folks, >> >>What happens if a package maintainer ignores upstream's >>version number (either on purpose, or by accident, e.g. >>a typo)? Is this allowed? > > > If it is done on purpose and for a given reason, it can be perfectly > valid. If not, you can consider that a bug, as usually package should > have the same version than upstream's distributed sources. > And how is this going to be fixed? The broken version number might be much higher than upstream's version number. AFAIK there is no way to turn it back, is it? The package I have in mind (fvwm) introduced a broken version number 2.5.130.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1 instead of 2.5.13-0.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1 Creating a bug report (#319386) did not help. Regards Harri
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature