Re: RFC, problem with g++4
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <email@example.com> writes:
> On 20050729T083332+0000, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
>> Of course, I could be persuaded that the enumeration is a good idea, but
>> I don't see what problem it solves, and it only seems to cause them.
> The anon enumeration trick has been an established C++ idom for years
> (ISTR, but cannot check now, even Stroustrup himself advocating it).
> It's a shame if it now suddenly stopped working and is somehow against
> the standard, even.
> The problem with #defines is that they're outside the language proper
> and, for example, pay no attention to namespaces.
> Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Debian developer
But that is C code and the defines are there anyway, but currently
they are save NOPs.