Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, W. Borgert wrote:
"Foo is a Perl-based program that..."
"libBar is written in C..."
"libBang is written in only 42 lines of source code..."
"Baz has been written by me..."
Do such descriptions justify bug reports of severity=minor?
Well, I would guess wishlist is the right way to go and the language
should go into debtags information as suggested by others. The language
a program is written in is completely irrelevant for user applications
and might more confuse user than beeing helpful. For librarie-dev
packages it might be helpful because it is relevent developer information.
Thanks for pointing this out