Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?
what do you think about the usefulness of technical (and other
strange) details in package description? I think, those are
annoying and should be avoided, but maybe I can learn, why they
are useful. Examples:
"Foo is a Perl-based program that..."
"libBar is written in C..."
"libBang is written in only 42 lines of source code..."
"Baz has been written by me..."
Do such descriptions justify bug reports of severity=minor?