Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed)
* sean finney <email@example.com> [050717 21:20]:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 09:04:57PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > Why not building curl --without-sssl and --with-gnutls=/usr? Maybe a
> > NMU?
> this is definitely NOT a reason to NMU libcurl. remember that it is
> your package that is "broken". of course you could still file a
> wishlist bug against libcurl asking to compile against gnutls
> instead, but it's up to the maintainer in question to decide.
Well, linking against openssl where gnutls support seems to be
available is at least an annoyance. The alternative is
to upload an alternative libcurl, duplicating the source code,
making it harder for everyone involved. So it is more than just
a avarage wishlist-bug where the maintainer's opinion is the last
Bernhard R. Link