[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dependency problems with Xorg

On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I know, but as written before, IMHO the abi version number should
> not be encoded in the package name. Usually you just get a new
> abi, but no new functionality, so why introduce a new name? Just
> to work around the limitations of dpkg? It is my suggestion to
> extend dpkg instead.

Look, nice theory, but we're dealing with the realities of Debian today.

Reply to: