[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: aspell dictionary packages fail to build

On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:01:03PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > The aspell dictionary packages build-depend on aspell-bin (>> 0.60).
> > aspell-bin is now a virtual package provided by aspell, but virtual
> > packages cannot be versioned, so these build-dependency cannot be
> > satisfied.
> > 
> > There are fifteen such packages:
> I'd see a benefit in filing mail beforehand for a change, but 
> after-the-fact, I have an impression that it's better to 
> file bugs on the packages since it's easier to track the problem that way.
> Unless there is a chance of reintroducing aspell-bin package, 
> that should probably be the case.
> I think this is the call of aspell maintainer.

Brian, are you planning to reintroduce the aspell-bin package or
should I file bugs against the packages that fail to build?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: