Hi, * Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> [2005-07-15 20:08]: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:42:44 +0200, Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de> said: > > > Hi, is there a policy for bugs which are unreproducible? I mean how > > long this kind of bug should be open? There are bugs who are > > unreproducible for over a year and the version increased to a major > > version during the time. Regards Nico > > Umm, no. It is left to the discretion and judgement of the > developer. Like others in the thread, I, too, tend to ask the > submitter if the bug can still be reproduced, and, if so, to resubmit > a log to see if any additional information has turned up. Yes thats what i would do too but I have seen alot of bugs where the emailaddress isn't actual anymore. > What's with the recent push to get every little things written > down into policy, so the developer no longer is required to have an > ability to think, or exercise any judgement whatsoever? no of course not but it would be good to have a reference value. Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: nion@jabber.ccc.de | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred
Attachment:
pgpOpvo6D9VL2.pgp
Description: PGP signature