Le vendredi 08 juillet 2005 à 06:46 +0900, Junichi Uekawa a écrit : > > > 1. It's linking with openssl, and claiming to be LGPL, which > > > I understand to be incompatible. > > > > It is compatible. > > Are you sure? > People were running around GPL is not compatible with > openssl license; and LGPL has a option to make the > code GPL. The point of the LGPL is to avoid such incompatibilities. If you can link it with proprietary code, you can also link it to code under the OpenSSL license. That said, I think too we should favor libgcrypt, because it has a lighter security record. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part