Re: mass bug filing for libjack dependant packages
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Robert Jordens wrote:
> I uploaded a new release of jack-audio-connection-kit to unstable. The
> following source packages have been built against libjack0.80.0-dev and
> must now be rebuilt against libjack0.100.0-dev due to incompatible API
> changes. I plan to file important bugs and then upgrade them to
> something RC after a few weeks. Is that OK?
While you probably mean ABI changes instead of incompatible API changes,
I would recommend that you first mail all maintainers by using the
firstname.lastname@example.org aliases before you mass file any bugs. You
could do this after some weeks, with those packages where nothing happened.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Fingerprint: 1710 7DB1 9A28 42FF B699 7654 ED1A 3933 B2CF CDD8
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----