Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:19:44PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2005 09:21, Glenn Maynard <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:58:11PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > Rejecting every suggestion for an improvement is not helpful.
> > Yes, it is, if every suggestion for "improvement" is a poor one. Lack
> > of good ideas does not justify bad ones; not having any good ideas does
> > not invalidate or in any way reduce the value of pointing out the bad
> > ones.
> Currently gluck.debian.org and murphy.debian.org seem to be the main sources
> of spam I receive. Given the discussion here it seems that my best option
> for reducing spam is to receive my mailing list messages through another
> account and have my main mail server reject all mail from gluck and murphy.
> Receiving huge volumes of spam is a bad idea. Lack of what you consider to be
> good ideas for dealing with spam does not justify reading it.
That's wonderful, but what I said stands.