Re: Debian concordance

To: Ian Murdock <imurdock@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: Debian concordance
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 21:25:09 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050618192509.GA13651@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: Ian Murdock <imurdock@gmail.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
In-reply-to: <[🔎] a77be96505061809352cb88e89@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20050614115012.GB15497@catsby.fooishbar.org> <1118752829.7142.187.camel@rosella.wigram> <20050614130521.GD15497@catsby.fooishbar.org> <[🔎] 42B1BCC0.3090803@progeny.com> <[🔎] 20050616175835.GJ15497@catsby.fooishbar.org> <[🔎] a77be96505061613245e24444c@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 625a0e65050616160323d6b083@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] a77be96505061711557b001ee1@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20050617221135.GC15989@alcor.net> <[🔎] a77be96505061809352cb88e89@mail.gmail.com>

On Jun 18, Ian Murdock <imurdock@gmail.com> wrote:

> "Debian packages just work" has been a truism for *years*, and it's been
And now people are learning that Debian packages are not Debian/unstable
packages nor Ubuntu packages. Big deal.
I still do not see any harm caused by this, except some speculation.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Debian concordance
  - From: Ian Murdock <imurdock@progeny.com>
- Re: Debian concordance
  - From: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
- Re: Debian concordance
  - From: Ian Murdock <imurdock@gmail.com>
- Re: Debian concordance
  - From: "Michael K. Edwards" <m.k.edwards@gmail.com>
- Re: Debian concordance
  - From: Ian Murdock <imurdock@gmail.com>
- Re: Debian concordance
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@ubuntu.com>
- Re: Debian concordance
  - From: Ian Murdock <imurdock@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian concordance
Next by Date: Re: Debian concordance
Previous by thread: Re: Debian concordance
Next by thread: Re: Debian concordance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread