Re: Planning a libglade to libglade2 transition

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Planning a libglade to libglade2 transition
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:05:14 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050616190514.GA19143@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050614201020.GC22672@mauritius.dodds.net>
References: <[🔎] 20050614124246.GA23935@deprecation.cyrius.com> <[🔎] 20050614201020.GC22672@mauritius.dodds.net>

* Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> [2005-06-14 13:10]:
> Many of these are GNOME1.x-specific libraries, in turn used by GNOME1.x
> applications that as yet have no GNOME2 equivalent.  (At the top of my
> personal list there is gnucash...)

Okay, given that GTK1 won't disappear immediately (and maybe should
also stay in etch, see Murray Cumming's comment in #279392 about 3rd
parties), I'm wondering whether the GNOME/GTK team is willing to adopt
libglade and do some low-level maintenance.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

References:
- Planning a libglade to libglade2 transition
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: Planning a libglade to libglade2 transition
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems
Next by Date: Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please
Previous by thread: Re: Planning a libglade to libglade2 transition
Next by thread: Re: Planning a libglade to libglade2 transition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread