[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Planning a libglade to libglade2 transition

Martin Michlmayr wrote:
libglade was orphaned 660 days ago and there's a libglade2 package in
the archive.  However, there are still 52 packages which depend or
build-depend on the old libglade.  Can someone please plan and
coordinate a transition to libglade2 so libglade can eventually be

The list of packages (this may contain source and binary packages):


xsitecopy will be removed after the next upload of the sitecopy source package -- it's currently FTBFS and upstream doesn't have any plan to continue working on it, so I've removed it from the source package (in the sense that the binary doesn't get built).

I've had an offer from Matt Palmer (mpalmer@debian.org) to sponsor the upload (most recent RFS here (1)) of sitecopy 0.15.1 -- he's been holding off while sarge was in the freezer.

So that's one package, anyways... :-)

(1) http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/05/msg00006.html

I was punching a text message into my     | Reed Snellenberger
phone yesterday and thought, "they need   | GPG KeyID: 5A978843
to make a phone that you can just talk    | rsnellenberger
into."             Major Thomb            |     -at-houston.rr.com

Reply to: