On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:06:45PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 June 2005 16:25, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:23:33AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > > To begin with we can all go back and review:
> > >
> > > http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?ReleaseProposals
> >
> > I reviewed it and it still all falls into two groups:
> >
> > - Hopelessly unworkable or silly ideas. ("Don't release", "Release no
> > matter how broken", "Do vastly more work than we currently fail to
> > do", "Replace Debian with Redhat^WMandrake^WGentoo^WUbuntu")
> >
> > - Votes for more money ("Suck less", "Release better and more often")
> >
> > So that was pretty useless.
> >
> > The page itself is a good example of why things are the way they are,
> > though.
>
> Would you please contribute your suggestions (either improve bits at that page
> or somewhere else) of how to improve things. Thanks.
What makes you think I have any?
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature