Re: And now for something completely different... etch!
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> No way. Debian has always avoided mindlessly dictating what runlevels
> must be used for. There's no reason to destroy this feature now. And
> there's no advantage to consuming an entire runlevel just to say
> "/etc/init.d/xdm stop" or "/etc/init.d/networking stop", which is all
> that you are proposing.
Roberto C. Sanchez writes:
> I agree. I rather like being able to configure run levels to my liking.
Why would defaulting to something other than the current flat arrangement
prevent you from configuring your runlevels to your liking?