[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: And now for something completely different... etch!

On 2005-06-07 04:57, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-06 at 01:03 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > - Separate runlevels: 2 for multi, no net, 3 for multi no X, 4 for X,
> > 4=5
> Do we really need that?  I thought I could always
> enable/disable/install/remove [xgk]dm.  And are these runlevels mandated
> (or at least documented) by any standard (besides 'the RH way')?  Are
> they at least consistent among ~"all distros besides Debian"?

If we're gonna change this, could we please use the LSB definition [1]?

Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
1. Encrypted mail preferred (GPG KeyID: 0x86624ABB)
2. Plain-text mail recommended since I move html and double
    format mails to a low priority folder (they're mainly spam)

Reply to: