Re: And now for something completely different... etch!
On 2005-06-07 04:57, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-06 at 01:03 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > - Separate runlevels: 2 for multi, no net, 3 for multi no X, 4 for X,
> > 4=5
>
> Do we really need that? I thought I could always
> enable/disable/install/remove [xgk]dm. And are these runlevels mandated
> (or at least documented) by any standard (besides 'the RH way')? Are
> they at least consistent among ~"all distros besides Debian"?
If we're gonna change this, could we please use the LSB definition [1]?
[1]
http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_2.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/runlevels.html
--
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
1. Encrypted mail preferred (GPG KeyID: 0x86624ABB)
2. Plain-text mail recommended since I move html and double
format mails to a low priority folder (they're mainly spam)
Reply to: