On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:49:09PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote: > Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes: > > In any case, given the number of prospective ports waiting in the > > wings, 11 is probably a roughly correct estimate even if we *do* drop > > some architectures. > Speaking of prospective ports, what would be the feasibility of keeping > testing frozen after sarge releases, do whatever toolchain updates are > needed to support amd64 via t-p-u, and release etch as a "sarge+amd64" > release in, say, 3 months? uh, probably roughly 0 I imagine, since such a project would be contending for archive space with the amd64 port for etch... But ultimately a question for the SRM and the ftpmasters anyway, I think. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature