* Roberto C. Sanchez (roberto@familiasanchez.net) wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 06:49:22PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > * Eric Dorland (eric@debian.org) wrote: > > > I don't think a dependency on automake and autoconf are almost always > > > bad ideas. It makes the build more unpredictable, which is generally a > > > bad thing. You should just run automake and/or autoconf on the > > > unpacked source and ship it in the .diff.gz. An extra 2K won't hurt. > > > > My English teachers would kill me. That should read: I think a > > build-dependency on automake and autoconf is almost always a bad > > idea... > > > > No problem. Based on the SubIDs in your GPG key, I consider myself > fortunate you did not also answer in French :-) (Sorry, I really > couldn't resist). Sadly, English is my first language. -- Eric Dorland <eric.dorland@mail.mcgill.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature